To us, imposing a fuel surcharge at a time when
the price of a barrel of oil averages $56 (just one-third
what it was during the $163 "Peak Oil" scare 11 years
ago this month) is rather like a hotel charging a resort
fee on top of the cost of the room rate. Back in March
2016, we covered the subject of fuel surcharges on
liveaboards and found that Explorer Ventures was one
of the few companies still regularly charging -- $200
per passenger -- for what was meant to be a temporary
measure. And it's still doing so. OK, the surcharge
our Caribbean Explorer II writer paid has decreased to
"only" $80, but still.
Back in 2016, Explorer Ventures CEO Clay
McCardell explained it thus: "Fuel cost is a difficult
issue, since it is often our largest single expense and
is highly variable. When we budget operational costs,
we can plan on fairly predictable increases in most of
our costs, but fuel is a wild card. Instead of charging a
higher package price across the board, we set our package
prices based on an average fuel budget for the year,
and then use the flexibility of the fuel surcharge in order
to try to meet that budget. That helps us to guarantee
reasonable package pricing a minimum of 12 months
in advance (often longer), with the understanding that
the surcharge can and will vary depending on local fuel
costs up until 30 days prior to the trip."
Then he added, "If oil prices remain stable and the
Caribbean catches up with the USA, I'd anticipate a
reduction of the fuel surcharge to zero soon."
Well, oil prices have been pretty stable, and we
haven't heard about any Caribbean oil crisis, so what
gives?
McCardell's reply to us in 2019 offers the same
justification for the fuel surcharge, which he says has
recently ranged from zero to $160 per person. "Yes, fuel
prices have gone down from their peaks -- so have our
surcharge levels, which again are reevaluated monthly
based on actual fuel prices. Local fuel pricing often
depends on factors other than world oil prices, and in
some areas only vaguely follows what people may see
at pumps in the U.S."
"No matter who people choose to travel with, they
will be paying for the vessel's fuel one way or another.
Either it's included in the price, which means the operator
is assuming the worst-case cost for fuel and keeping
the difference if the price is lower, or it's separated out,
as we do, to let us keep our package prices in line. We
feel our method is fairer and costs the client less."
A candid, straightforward response. But where do
you draw the line? If the cost of produce goes up, will
Explorer Ventures add a food surcharge? If its insurance
goes up, does it add a surcharge for that?
With new sources of oil being discovered worldwide,
and slumping global economies fighting off
recession, demand for oil is below expectation. So
we're not buying the "fuel as a wild card" factor,
Explorer Ventures. Anticipate market fluctuations well
and you make money. Don't read the financial winds
correctly, and you take it in the shorts. It's called "the
cost of doing business."
And while at least the company openly calls it a
fuel surcharge, it seems like a bad business practice to
charge a fee that's totally unnecessary at a time when
there's no oil crisis anywhere.