Occasionally Undercurrent gets
complaints from divers who have
been barred or suspended from diving,
for one reason or another, at
a resort or on a live-aboard. This is
a rare occurrence, but it can have
ramifications for everyone on a liveaboard
or at a resort.
Most dive operators don’t publicize
their disciplinary policies, but
the Peter Hughes fleet provides a
detailed breakdown on its website,
saying they “reserve the right to
refuse service to any diver whose behavior is believed to be a danger
to the safe operation of the vessel.
Divers who exhibit objectionable
personal conduct, excessive alcohol
use or lack of sufficient diving skills
or knowledge can be refused air fills
at the Captain’s discretion. … The
company further hereby reserves the
right in its sole and unfettered discretion,
to decline to allow any Guest to
participate in certain diving activities
based on medical information, documentation
and/or authorization(s),
or the lack thereof.”
Some operations will close down
a diver for a rapid ascent, even
when the diver shows no signs of
the bends or an embolism |
Bill Christoffers, owner of Conch
Club Divers on Little Cayman, points
out, “No dive operation, boat captain,
divemaster, or instructor wants
to deny a guest his or her diving. Our
focus is to ensure our guests have
the best diving experience possible
so they will return. We only have a
few cases a year where we ask a guest
to leave the group and only then if
one or more of three guidelines are repeatedly violated: violating the
dive profile, especially if a diver’s
computer locks down for a deco
violation, purposeful touching of anything
underwater, and diving without
a buddy.
“A rogue diver,” states
Christoffers, “can disrupt a dive boat,
create a negative and tense atmosphere
for the guests and crew and
be a danger to himself and others.”
To see what divers think about
getting barred, we queried our subscribers
via our monthly
email. Several disciplinary
incidents seem to
have been handled judiciously,
but there were
horror stories, too.
Rules is Rules
Virtually every dive
operator asks guests to
return with a certain amount of gas
left in their tanks, usually 500 psi,
sometimes more. At Voyages Resort
on Australia’s Heron Island less than
700 psi can be a punishable offense.
Scott Johnson (Palm Springs, CA),
on board the resort’s dive boat, he
saw a diver come up with 550 psi and
was warned. “The next dive he came
up with 450 psi and was suspended
from diving for three days.” Johnson
says the diver appealed to the GM of
the resort but without luck. The manager
of the dive operation ruled.
The boat captain told Johnson
that authorities inspect resort dive
logs. If they see too many violations,
a divemaster or skipper could be
fined or lose their licenses. However,
Johnson notes that no such limits
were enforced on the Mike Ball boat
he took to the Cod Hole on the same
vacation, when they allowed him to
dive his own profile.
Many divemasters check divers’
computers for violations, which
may limit diving. Some time ago,
Nicholas McGregor (Owatonna, MN)
was aboard the Okeanos Aggressor diving
Cocos Island. After a difficult
dive involving great exertion due to
currents and an extended deep stay,
McGregor’s buddy’s Aladin computer
went into decompression mode. And
when he surfaced after violating his
computer’s parameters, it locked for
24 hours, as it is designed to do.
McGregor says the divemaster
made sure his buddy did not have
any signs of DCS. However, he
wouldn’t permit him to dive until his
computer came out of lockout mode.
“My buddy had another computer
that he was willing to use, since he
felt great and we were not going
to dive until the next morning,”
McGregor reports. Of course, switching
computers in mid trip would
throw off subsequent decompression
calculations. Wisely, the divemaster
insisted. While the original computer
was locked out, McGregor’s buddy
would not be permitted to dive.
The divemaster got through to
McGregor’s buddy by telling him
that he would probably be lynched
by the other 17 divers if he let him
dive. They had each spent a great
deal of money to go on this trip, and
to make the boat return because of
one diver’s error -- which was easily
averted by not permitting him to dive
-- would have been ridiculous.
Some operations will close down
a diver for a rapid ascent, even if the
diver shows no signs of the bends or
an embolism. During a dive on the
Yukon off San Diego, Janine Maira
(Palm Springs, CA) saw her buddy
signal he was out of air and bolt for
the surface. She raced after him with
her spare regulator. “Clearly,” says Maira, “that was not a good choice
of action at 85 feet, but I was worried
that he was going to pass out.” She
didn’t catch him, and slowed her
ascent once she saw him break the
surface. However, she skipped her
safety stop in case he needed help.
The divemaster jumped in the water
and towed him back to the dive boat,
Lois Ann.
Around the same time, another
diver had also signaled to his buddy
that he was out of air. She turned
to look for the anchor line, reports
Maira, and when she looked back he
had bolted to the surface. (Both incidents
underscore the need for rapid
response when a diver gives the outof-
air signal.)
Maira recalls that Eric, the divemaster
on the Lois Ann, “was kind and concerned and never did he
scold anyone for their actions. He privately
talked with all of us and strongly
recommended that we not do the
next dive and we agreed. I don’t
think other passengers knew what was
going on, since it was handled discreetly.
I don’t think it affected their
diving in any way.”
A couple of years ago, Kenneth
Cohen (New York, NY) was at the
Galapagos Islands on a Peter Hughes
boat. At one point, he had to ascend
rapidly to catch his wife who had
lost her weight belt. “She was OK,”
says Cohen, “but I had violated the
computer’s safety mode.” The captain
administered oxygen, watched him
and explained the need to avoid diving
for a day. “His actions were perfectly
proper and professional,” says Cohen, an MD. “I was glad that he
kept me from doing anything stupid.”
More and more dive boat crews
are asking divers to sit out after a
rapid ascent, even if they are asymptomatic.
The theory is that without
being able to off-gas during a slow
ascent and safety stop, residual nitrogen
bubbles remain in the body.
These “silent bubbles” can grow or
cluster with other bubbles on a subsequent
dive.
Joel Dovenbarger, Vice President
of Medical Services for Divers Alert
Network (DAN), heartily endorses
waiting 24 hours after a rapid ascent,
especially following multiple dives.
Says Dovenbarger, “Rapid ascent is as
much a violation of the dive tables as
staying too long at depth.”
Undercurrent writer Doc Vikingo
points out that less than half the
cases of DCS manifest within an hour
after the dive. Onset is within three
hours in 60 percent of the cases,
within eight hours in 83 percent
and within 24 hours in 98 percent.
Risk remains over the next 24 hours
or so. “Sit-outs provide an opportunity
to review what went wrong and consider ways of preventing a recurrence,”
says Doc.
Bruce Wienke, creator of the
RGBM (Reduced Gradient Bubble
Model) used in many dive computers,
finds a 24-hour surface interval
extreme. He told Undercurrent that
residual bubbles will disappear in
three or four hours, “unless you’ve
clobbered the schedules.” He also points out that his RGBM model
remembers a rapid ascent and shortens
the diver’s time-depth profile on
the next dive to make up for it.
“One thing is for sure,” says Doc
Vikingo, “whether or not such policies
prevent divers from getting bent,
they often cause them to get bent
out of shape.”
Some operators insist on strict adherence to the buddy system. Rod
Dingess (Statesville, NC), who’s been diving
for 35 years and is also an instructor,
sent along three such cases.
Last year, Dive Provo in the Turks and
Caicos had to call in divers and go looking
for one who went off by herself along
a wall. Says Dingess, “She was found within
10 minutes. She was gently reminded
not to go off by herself. She apologized
to everyone and elected not to make the
second dive. The crew was calm, and handled
the incident like it was an everyday
occurrence.”
Not all divers are so cooperative.
On a boat dive with Coastal Scuba off
Myrtle Beach, SC, one diver refused to
be matched up with a buddy, per the
expressed rule, and was loud and belligerent.
Dingess says the diver “simply
back-rolled off the boat, then exceeded
the agreed-upon dive duration by 30
minutes.” When he surfaced, Capt. Buddy
met him at the dive platform and told
him he would not dive again this day. He
got angry and demanded repayment for
his lost dive. Buddy showed his signed liability
form, and told him he had forfeited
his money when he dove alone.
At Lion Dive in Bonaire, one fellow in
his group was an instructor, had technical
training, and a solo dive certification.
“He touted his card as his reason to be
excused from the rules of the boat,” says Dingess. The crew told him that what he
did on unsupervised shore dives was his
business, but if he dived solo from the
boat he would lose his boat dive privileges.
“If he had not been such a loud,
obnoxious buffoon about the issue, they
might not have evoked their power,” says
Dingess, adding, “After that, if he signed
up for a trip, the rest of us canceled. The
dive shop got the message, and told him
he was persona non grata.”
Unfortunately, not all dive operations
are so enlightened. At the Turks & Caicos
Club Med, Suzanne Berger (Agoura Hills,
CA) was buddied up with a fellow who
had fewer than 30 dives and no computer.
Because the divemasters were busy teaching
a class, says Berger, they expected
her to look after the newbie. “When we
returned to the boat,” she says, “the other
diver had slightly exceeded his tables. My
computer showed I was well within my
limits, but because we were buddies we
both had to sit out the next dive.” Berger
went out with Turtle Divers the rest of the
week.
Obviously, there can be many reasons
for denying a diver access to the water,
and they vary between operations. In the
next issue, we’ll look at more subjective
cases, when divers were barred or suspended
due to insufficient skills or fitness
problems … both physical and mental.
And, what to do to ensure you are never
barred.