the U.S. Government is cracking down
The U.S. government is cracking
down on travel to Cuba. While
American divers have been reaching
Cuba on flights embarking from
Canada, the Bahamas and Mexico,
(at least before September 11), U.S.
agents were meeting return flights
and laying down the law.
One of our fearless correspondents
wrote about Cuba diving
(January 1999), after signing up with
Scubacan, a Toronto travel agency
that advertised a fully hosted, completely
“legal” Cuban dive trip advertised
in American dive magazines.
He fudged to get around the U.S.
government travel embargo and
pointed out the risks Americans face
when traveling to Cuba. Now one
of our subscribers, whom we’ll call
“Johnson,” reports serious problems.
After hearing his story, it’s understandable
why Johnson prefers to
remain anonymous.
Encouraged by a glossy Scubacan
brochure, Johnson booked a trip
through his local dive shop on
Scubacan’s Ocean Diver live-aboard.
The brochure read, in part:
“There is no law forbidding
American citizens to travel to Cuba.
The catch is, however, that American
citizens can’t spend money there.
That’s the current law ... Scubacan
International Cuban Dive
Adventures are totally prepaid, fully
hosted and sponsored. You don’t
spend money while in Cuba. In the
past, management officials have
escorted hundreds of American travelers
to Cuba without mishap.”
Upon Johnson’s return through
Toronto, U.S. Customs officials
asked him and his party to fill out a
form listing the countries visited
since their departure. Being honest
citizens, and having faith in
Scubacan’s written assurances, they
listed Cuba.
That was Johnson’s first mistake,
according to Keith Bolender, who
runs Scubacan. He said that when
Johnson booked his trip he should
have received a two-page Scubacan
advisory for Americans going
through customs. That advisory
warns that if you declare you’ve been
to Cuba, you’re likely to be detained
and questioned. The U.S. Treasury
Department will then send you a
questionnaire asking you to selfincriminate
yourself. Johnson said
he did not receive the Scubacan advisory.
A couple of months later, Johnson
(and other group members) received
a formal questionnaire from the
Treasury Department’s Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and
he responded.
Mistake number two, says
Scubacan. The Scubacan advisory
says: “Do not under any circumstance
fill out this form before you
call us. Once you call us, we will provide the proper response to the
Treasury Department and no further
action will be taken ... If you fill out
this document before contacting
Scubacan, we cannot be responsible
for any further charges or actions
the Treasury Department may take.”
Bolender tells us that clients are
typically advised to ignore the form
and the Treasury Department always
drops its claim.
Nine months later Johnson
received a notice that he had violated
the U.S. Trading with the Enemy
Act by engaging in tourist-related
transactions in Cuba. Specifically, the
notice cited a $20 airport tax. While
Bolender assured us that such taxes
are paid by Scubacan, one advisory
Johnson received from Scubacan
recommends that one carry $250 inpocket
money for beverages, snacks,
souvenirs and the departure tax. In
this regard, Scubacan’s fully hosted
“legal” trips don’t measure up.
For an American to spend money legally
in Cuba, he must be licensed by the
Treasury Department. And licenses will
not be considered for pleasure travelers. |
The notice said the Treasury
Department would issue a claim
against Johnson for a $7,500 penalty,
give him 20 days to respond, and
would inform him of his right to
request a hearing. Johnson replied,
but on the advice of his dive shop’s
legal counsel, did not request a
hearing. Later he changed his
mind, but that was beyond the 20-
day deadline.
Johnson contacted Scubacan for
help, which handed him off to the
Center for Constitutional Rights in
New York, a nonprofit organization
that could represent him before the
OFAC. The Center advised Johnson
that he had no bargaining position
since he hadn’t requested a hearing.
(Scubacan said that when people do
request a hearing, their cases are
generally dismissed because OFA C
has no mechanism for a hearing
process.)
Later, the Center told one of
Johnson’s traveling companions that
they had stopped taking referrals
from Scubacan due to the volume of
cases. Bolender says Scubcan’s U.S.
attorneys are handling cases directly.
So far, no actual claims have been
filed against Johnson and his friends,
but they are still living under the
threat.
Meanwhile, Scubacan, which has
been advising Americans about U.S.
law at will, has changed its tune. An
advertisement in the August Sport
Diver makes no claim about the legalities
of Cuban travel. And its listing in
the August Skin Diver Overseas Divers
Directory states only that all programs
conform to government regulations.
But, we don’t think so.
You see, for an American to spend
money legally in Cuba, he must be
licensed by the Treasury Department.
And licenses are granted only to
journalists and staff employed by
news reporting organizations (freelancers
need not apply), official government
travelers, and researchers,
teachers, and exchange students
meeting stiff standards, athletes, and
certain religious folks. While other
licenses may be granted, they will not
be considered for pleasure travelers.
Fully hosted or sponsored travelers
may venture to Cuba without licenses
if all Cuba-related expenses are covered
by a person not subject to U.S.
jurisdiction. However, OFAC does
not consider travel hosted or sponsored
if a U.S. traveler pays any travel
expenses, even to a third-country
person or entity not subject to U.S.
jurisdiction (such as Scubacan) at
any time.
Anyone who travels to Cuba, even
on a fully hosted trip, is likely to
spend money. How else can you sip
a minty mojito or puff a mellow
Cohiba? Bolender advises that on a
fully hosted trip, your escort will complete
your transactions for you. But,
under U.S. law, even that is illegal.
David Falk wrote in the S t .
Petersburg Times in August, that the
Bush administration is clamping
down after years of the government
turning a blind eye. “From May 4 to
July 30, the U.S. Treasury Department
sent out 443 letters to suspected illicit
travelers. That was a dramatic
increase from the 74 letters mailed
in the previous four months. In the
past, lawyers advised people receiving
such notices to negotiate payment
with the Treasury Depart-ment, or
else demand an administrative hearing
to contest the fine. The Treasury
Department was usually happy to
negotiate much lower fines; just a
few hundred dollars in some cases.
“Because of a lack of judges
assigned to embargo issues, hearings
were never held, creating a backlog
of unresolved cases ... But the
Treasury Department now says it
plans to begin using judges from the
Environmental Protection Agency to
hear travel cases. Several recent cases
have made a mockery of the regulations.
One Seattle man was fined
after he traveled to Cuba to bury his
father’s ashes. The Treasury
Department tried to impose a
$20,000 penalty, but settled for much
less ... Yet the actor Kevin Costner
had no trouble when he recently
applied for a license to visit Cuba to
show his latest film about the 1962
Cuban missile crisis, Thirteen Days. A
New York attorney says it isn’t so
difficult to travel to Cuba legally, and
cites the license granted to a karate
club exchange, as well as another for crocodile research in Cuba.”
Before September 11, Congress
was moving to override both the
federal ban on Cuban travel and
Bush’s insistence on enforcing it.
But until then, a diver who travels
to Cuba without a license is a
scofflaw, no matter what Scubacan
says, and faces the possibility of big
fines. However, Treasury
Department agents may have other
concerns these days. As of this writing,
whether it will lead to even closer
scrutiny of Americans traveling to
Cuba, or, on the other hand, a disinterest
in applying fines, is uncertain.