Current American reporting on diver errors leading to fatalities falls short of
what we divers need to know to dive more safely. Although John McAniff, of the
University of Rhode Island Underwater Research Institute, made an effort to get
at diver error, he no longer has government funding. DAN is the only other
source of such information; as you would expect, it emphasizes the medical
elements of fatalities.
If we turn to the U.K., Australia, and New Zealand, however, we can often
find useful analyses. In a recently published New Zealand study of 1,000 diving
incidents, 154 involved buoyancy jacket use, misuse, and malfunction. Nearly
one-third (48) led to serious injury, including 17 DCS cases, 12 embolisms, and
10 pulmonary barotraumas.
Because so many errors occurred among experienced divers, we have decided
to provide a synopsis of the study to help divers understand what can go wrong.
The original report, prepared by Dr. Criss Acott of the Hyperbaric Medicine unit
at the Royal Adelaide Hospital in Australia, appeared in the South Pacific
Underwater Medicine Society Journal.
Power inflation mechanisms can
change a diver's buoyancy and
depth very rapidly. Consequently,
it's not surprising that BC problems
are a cause of both injury and death. In fact, in one study of
100 Australian and New Zealand
diver deaths, overinflation or the
failure of the inflation mechanism
were major contributors.
In our Diving Incident
Monitoring Study, two common
factors in BC incidents were the
failure of divers to deflate their
BCs (89 incidents, including 79
certified divers, 27 of whom held
advanced or higher certification)
and not knowing how to use them
(71 incidents, including 59
certified divers, 17 of whom were
advanced or higher).
The inability to exhaust air
from a BC and the consequent
rapid ascent was the main cause
of injury. Some incidents occurred
when a diver was unable to adjust
his buoyancy adequately at a
decompression or safety stop.
Of the 154 incidents, 39 could
have been prevented if divers had
simply checked their BCs before
diving.
Of the 79 incidents analyzed
(see table) where there were
problems with the power inflator,
in 31 cases the inflation mechanism
failed, in 26 the diver
pressed the wrong button, and in
15 the power inflator activated
spontaneously because of either
poor design by the manufacturer
or poor maintenance by the diver.
Eight incidents involved
inadequate buoyancy on the
surface; all resulted in injury. None
of the divers removed their weight
belts, and four did not know how to
orally inflate their BC.
Most power inflation failure
incidents could have been
avoided by securing the inflator
in an accessible position and
making a thorough pre-dive
check. However, the highest rate
of injury arising from power
inflation failures was associated
with being either low on air or out
of air, situations that appropriate
air-supply management would
have prevented.
Incidents in which the diver
overused the power inflator to maintain buoyancy and in which
divers were unable to control
their ascent after their weight belt
became dislodged are indicative
of divers using their BC as the
main or sole means of buoyancy
control. This is poor diving
technique and can be avoided by
better training.
On most BCs, the inflating and
deflating buttons are too close
together -- a hazard illustrated by
the number of incidents caused
by divers failing to distinguish
between them. In many emergencies,
neither the diver nor his
buddy was able to activate either
mechanism. They should be
separated and secured on different
sides of the jacket, standardized
to reduce the risk of error. This
would make them accessible during
an emergency and would improve
the ability of divers to control
their buoyancy, particularly
during an emergency air-sharing
ascent -- especially if the second
stage of the donor's spare regulator
were part of, or attached to,
the BC's power-inflator hose.
To dive safely, divers need to
be prepared to decrease the rate
on an uncontrolled ascent and
should be particularly aware of
the ascent changes that occur in
the last 15 feet of a dive.
Ben Davison
Contributing Factors and Deaths Associated with 89 |
Incidents Involving Inadequate BC Deflation |
Contributing Factors |
Number |
Deaths |
Diver was not familiar with the BC's functions |
40 |
20 |
Insufficient time to activate deflation mechanism |
26 |
12 |
Diver's buddy was unable to activate the deflation mechanism due to its inaccessible position |
9 |
6 |
Maximum deflation rate was inadequate |
6 |
1 |
Deflation mechanism was inaccessible to the diver |
5 |
1 |
Deflation mechanism was faulty |
3 |
1 |
Totals |
89 |
41 |
Contributing Factors in 16 Incidents Where the BC |
Provided Inadequate Buoyancy |
Contributing Factors* |
Number |
Deaths |
Low-air situation |
5 |
3 |
Diver didn't know how to orally inflate the BC** |
4 |
2 |
The power inflator was not connected** |
4 |
2 |
The dump valve malfunctioned** |
2 |
0 |
Out-of-air situation |
1 |
1 |
The diver was unable to locate the inflator** |
1 |
1 |
The inflator hose was leaking** |
1 |
1 |
BC provided inadequate buoyancy while retrieving the anchor |
1 |
1 |
BC leaking** |
1 |
0 |
* These contributing factors are not mutually exclusive. |
** Could have been prevented by a pre-dive check. |