"The idea of taking underwater photographs with
a quality camera can be exciting, what with the beautiful
things you might see and be able to capture. On
the other hand, an expensive camera is probably one
of the last things anyone wants to take near water, let
alone under it."
That's what Polaroid says about its latest foray into
the world of underwater photography. It's launched a
polycarbonate housing for a variety of popular DSLR
cameras, but alas, its designers have failed to understand
the different conditions faced by underwater
photographers compared to those working on land. In
fact, it looks suspiciously like those inexpensive housings
made by Mekon in China and suffers the same
problems in that it has a fixed flat glass port, not long
enough to encompass a macro lens, and it's not a
dome port, needed to work with a wide-angle or fisheye
lens. It's "rated to 165 feet" so it should keep the water
out, but it's more suited for use in the surf than as a
diver's camera housing. At roughly $350 (not including the camera), it may be good value for those with lesser expectations.
Leica's new release, the16-megapizel waterproof
X-U, misses the point if they intended to introduce it
to the scuba market. It can be used down to 49 feet for
up to one hour (it's unclear why there would be a time
limit!), so that excludes it from being useful to most
divers. Though it has a fabulous Summilux lens, with a
wide aperture for use in low light, its long focal length
is not good for getting close and reducing the amount
of water between it and the subject. The built-in strobe
is positioned so close to the lens that every picture you
produce will look like you shot it in a snowstorm --
thanks to the backscatter it provides. Priced around
$3000, for underwater use it's a design tragedy.
Olympus follows the trend with its all-new Stylus
Tough TG Tracker, putting the built-in video light right
next to the lens. It may be good to go to 100 feet deep
but turn that light on and you'll record nothing but
backscatter.
- John Bantin