PADI, which started as a little nonprofit organization
decades ago, has not only been owned by a private
equity firm, it's just been sold to another private equity
firm. The New York firm Lincolnshire Management
announced in August that it had bought PADI
Worldwide Corp., based in Rancho Santa Maragarita,
CA, from Seidler Equity Partners.
Lincolnshire's managing director Kate Lehman told
Buyouts that she and her colleagues liked PADI because
of its global presence, and because of Lincolnshire's
experience with membership-supported organizations
that provide training in the sports and recreation industry.
Holdings in the firm's portfolio also include Flight
Training Acquisitions, an aviation training company,
and The Alaska Club, a chain of fitness clubs in Alaska.
Lincolnshire's two big goals: expand PADI into Asia,
and lure younger generations into diving. "Scuba is a
steady business, and we see growth coming out of Asia,
as well as with 'Generation Y' consumers, or those generally
in their 20s and 30s," Lehman said. Lincolnshire
will also help build out PADI's social media platform.
Lehman said PADI's performance has remained
strong in recent years, despite the Great Recession, but
she wouldn't give the details of its financials. Nor is Lincolnshire releasing terms of the deal, though it typically
backs companies with revenues between $50 million
to $500 million, and operating cash flow of $5 million
to $50 million.
Will this deal help PADI improve its dive training
standards? It's too soon to tell, but the focus on an
expansion into Asia and social media platforms seems
to signal that Lincolnshire and PADI have a "bigger is
better" focus, and changing the way it currently trains
divers is at the bottom of the to-do list.
Peter Meyer, senior vice-president of Willis
Recreational Diving Insurance, is not too optimistic that
this deal will change anything. "I have always felt that
PADI was missing something with respect to its handling
of dive training (too simple, too fast), and would
expect this sale to simply confirm that attitude going
forward. For example, I do not believe that anyone can
be an 'Advanced' or 'Master diver, based on current
PADI training program outlines - the names just do not
support the real ability of those individuals that take
these programs - and I think the entire industry already
recognizes that. I am involved in some litigation that has
PADI training as a focal point, so I can't address that in
any further detail, but I can tell you that I think its standards
and training are part of the overall problem with
the industry."