It seems like only yesterday that I was commissioned by a British magazine to write an article explaining
the advantages of diving with a computer. That was 25 years ago, and the computer I had then cost
$600, which was a lot of money in those days. It was such a flamboyant display of wealth that other divers
- - total strangers - - would try to rip it off my wrist at dive sites with the excuse that computers were dangerous
and I should stick to tables, watches and depth-gauges like the rest of them. Of course, it was really
the cost that offended them. Today, few divers would consider diving without one computer and many
even use a second one as backup. They have become so relatively cheap that nearly every serious diver can
afford to do that.
The manufacture of diving computers originally fell to a couple of companies. In Europe, diving computers
bearing different brands all came from the same factory in Switzerland. Then that Finnish upstart
Suunto got in on the act, although it stayed firmly with everything under its own label. In America, one of
Bob Hollis' companies dominated the computer market, manufacturing for many different brands as well
as Oceanic and Aeris. Companies that wanted something different went to Seiko in Japan, a company that
made no computer under its own label but was happy to manufacture for others.
The diving business is very small. I was once told that the entire annual production of current European
brand-leader Suunto by units only equalled 10 minutes of Nokia's cell phone production (a lot more people
use phones, obviously). Similarly, Seiko makes a lot of products, and I'm told it no longer has an interest
in the small world of diving computers. This left companies that relied on Seiko supplies out in the cold.
Cressi, in Italy, was one of them. Not daunted, Cressi decided to source its own unique product locally. The
Cressi Leonardo is it.
The Algorithm
Where do dive computer manufacturers mostly go today for algorithms? One man has grabbed the limelight.
When he's not busy working on nuclear weapons at Los Alamos,
NM, Bruce Wienke likes to write decompression software for the leisure
diving industry. To my knowledge, he has done this for Suunto,
Mares and Atomic, and now he has written a nine-tissue version of his
Reduced Gradient Bubble Model (RGBM) algorithm for Cressi.
Before any geeks write in to say that this is not a proper RGBM, I
would like to mention that when the great physicist was questioned
about this, he answered that it would only be possible to write a pure
RGBM if it was also possible to miss out on the shallow part of the dive. Obviously, that is not possible. The algorithm takes into account silent micro bubbles that might form the
nuclei of symptomatic bubbles during a second dive or series of dives.
The Instrument
The Leonardo's LCD face measures 1.8 inches in diameter, and is hidden behind a protective layer of
transparent plastic. It has a strap long enough to go round any wrist clad in a drysuit cuff, while being easy
to replace should it be necessary. It is set up using a single button, which is pressed in sequence to access
the various menus. When adjusting any part such as the nitrox setting, one must be careful not to overshoot
because it is slightly irritating to have to work all the way round again. When I first set it up, there was
some frantic button-pressing accompanied by one or two harsh words, but then, I do tend to be impatient.
In the Water
At a time when Internet forums on diving are full of recommendations to buy technical diving computers
on the basis of "you're going to need one, one day," it was refreshing to get into the water undaunted
by my own possible lack of technology skills. This computer is designed for use by those who want to go
leisure diving and enjoy other reasons for being underwater than using the gear.
It proved straightforward to use, gave clear information, guided me when I was probably better off
pausing for a minute or two at depth on the way up, gave a clear indication of remaining no-stop time
or deco requirements, and beeped at me if I went up too quickly. It indicated clearly the safety stop time,
and if I needed to see the screen more clearly in the dark, pressing a button switched on its own backlight.
Unsurprisingly, the information it gave regarding deco requirements during the dive were not dissimilar
to that given to me by the Suunto (also using a Wienke RGBM) alongside it, including the option to enable
deep stops and a variable safety setting. What more do you want?
Of course, if you are one of those people who like to do six dives per day, the RGBM might punish you
with shorter and shorter no-stop times. If you tend to be more European in your style of diving with, say,
only three longer and possibly deeper dives in a 24-hour period, you'll find this computer will be ideal. You
cannot program in your own gradient factors or your own algorithm -- Bruce Wienke, in his infinite wisdom,
has done that for you. Buy it, set it, strap it on and go diving.
After the Dive
Finally, for someone who works in media, what a pleasure it was to find that the computer interface and
software for the Leonardo was equally at home on either a PC or a Mac. Times are tough, and Cressi has
brought this Wienke-type computer to the market at a fiercely competitive $350 list price. I imagine we'll be
seeing a lot of them at dive sites before long.
John Bantin is the technical editor of DIVER magazine in the United Kingdom. For 20 years, he has used and reviewed virtually
every piece of equipment available in the U.K. and the U.S., and makes around 300 dives per year for that purpose. He is also a
professional underwater photographer.