Subscriber Neal Langerman (San Diego) asked me
this question: “What can the diver do when faced with an
unacceptable release? Is signing it is the only option? This
seems like coercion. I try to remove the negligence releases,
but many operators simply refuse to let you on board if you
change the form.”
Sign it anyway, because you can then contest the objectionable
provision if the release later becomes relevant due
to a lawsuit. A diver does not give up his right to contest
the objectionable provision by dint of having earlier signed
the release. The court will not enforce the provision to the
extent that it releases, say, grossly negligent conduct or conduct
that violates some statute.
Two factors work in your favor in contesting even a legal
provision. First, courts insist the releasing language be clear
and conspicuous, because they closely scrutinize exculpatory
clauses that release a person in advance for negligent
conduct. Also, releases are “adhesive,” meaning they contain
standardized language the other side must accept as
is with no chance to negotiate. The upshot is that courts
will interpret in the diver’s favor any provision the court
decides is ambiguous and subject to more than one reasonable
interpretation. The second factor in your favor is that
a court won’t grant a summary judgment motion if it feels
there is any important fact that should be left for a trial.
With all this said, however, the fact remains that courts
frequently grant release-based summary judgments to dive
operators and other recreational activity providers. Were
this not so, many of them would cease operations, either
because they couldn’t obtain liability coverage, or no coverage
at an affordable premium. And an operator without
liability insurance is probably not a good choice for your
next dive outing.
- - Larry Schnabel